Battlefield Community Forums • View topic

LAYZEE=SOD= · **Posted:** Thu Feb 17, 2011 2:59 am

-=OVERKILL=- wrote:

I agree that rank has nothing to do with aggression in general. But, speaking after playing BF2 for over 1800 hours I have to say that the most aggressive players I have ever seen are always ranks from First SGT to SGT Major. I even remember I use to play with much more aggression back then but with less experience. Now I play relaxed and much more experience. Back when I was SGT major and such you feel you've seen enough but you are still fresh to the game so you end up being aggressive and three stars or what not mean nothing to you which is a big mistake. There is a reason they have that higher rank. The more you think you know the more you realize you knew nothing and by the time you are a three or 4 star or even 1 star general you really look back and say omg I was such a nOOb. That's my opinion I'm not here trying to convince any1 or anything.

Agree with some of what you say but there are exceptions, I have seen 3 and 4 stars playing like complete dumbasses, i mean these guys musta got their stars free with Kellogs or something ABSOLUT_SP is one always trying to glitch into buildings wtf !!! pfft

Evil_Black_Fox · **Posted:** Thu Feb 17, 2011 5:49 am

Hgjw wrote:

You can get it but is it worth it to spend 2 years of your life for getting 1 extra star.

Evil_Black_Fox wrote:

c0dy wrote:

I think its sorta cool cause the ppl on ur team are like "WTF that private rapes face" and then they look at the score board and see the 4 stars and they're like "gg son"

Actually rank wise, I think the 1 star generals are usually the most aggressive players.

rank has nothing to do with that ..

Think about how often you see 1 star generals and how active they are when you do. Of course rank has little to do with anything but the requirements to get 1 star are without being promoted to 2 star right away says something about that player.

Hgjw · **Posted:** Thu Feb 17, 2011 8:29 am

i got no experience of that since i almost immidietly got 2 star :p

LAYZEE=SOD= · **Posted:** Thu Feb 17, 2011 9:00 am

LAYZEE=SOD= wrote:

-=OVERKILL=- wrote:

I agree that rank has nothing to do with aggression in general. But, speaking after playing BF2 for over 1800 hours I have to say that the most aggressive players I have ever seen are always ranks from First SGT to SGT Major. I even remember I use to play with much more aggression back then but with less experience. Now I play relaxed and much more experience. Back when I was SGT major and such you feel you've seen enough but you are still fresh to the game so you end up being aggressive and three stars or what not mean nothing to you which is a big mistake. There is a reason they have that higher rank. The more you think you know the more you realize you knew nothing and by the time you are a three or 4 star or even 1 star general you really look back and say omg I was such a nOOb. That's my opinion I'm not here trying to convince any1 or anything.

Agree with some of what you say but there are exceptions, I have seen 3 and 4 stars playing like complete dumbasses, i mean these guys musta got their stars free with Kellogs or something ABSOLUT_SP is one always trying to glitch into buildings wtf !!! pfft

Correction he is butter bar rank not a starry eyed person but still a glitcher

bipsylalapo · **Joined:** Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:25 pm **Posts:** 163

Not to mention I see lots of 3-4 stars nade spam so their rank is totally meaningless to me.

Evil_Black_Fox · **Posted:** Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:28 am

bipsylalapo wrote:

Not to mention I see lots of 3-4 stars nade spam so their rank is totally meaningless to me.

You cant nade spam past Colonel. At some point you have to become a veteran in just about everything to get to 1 star

ProneBird · **Posted:** Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:55 pm

who cares about rank? o.O
Most people can't play the game anyway

Hgjw · **Posted:** Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:11 pm

ProneBird wrote:

who cares about rank? o.O
Most people can't play the game anyway

Based on ?

Bourne · **Posted:** Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:09 pm

Hgjw wrote:

ProneBird wrote:

who cares about rank? o.O
Most people can't play the game anyway

Based on ?

His own ability level ? :shock:

ProneBird · **Posted:** Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:41 pm

based on the average public player (last 2 years)